Riya Chakraborty’s lawyer, Satish Maneshinde, has reacted to the Supreme Court’s Thursday decision to use statements made by the accused within the cases of drug abuse and trafficking under the Narcotics Act before the investigating officers to convict them. can’t be done. The court said it might be a protection against “violation” of fundamental rights for all times , equality and self-protection.
Maneshinde has welcomed the decision , saying that now, ‘a sizable amount of accused will see the sunshine of day’. Riya has been accused of shopping for drugs for actor Sushant Singh Rajput, whom she had been dating since the time of her death.
consistent with the days of India, he said during a statement, “The decision presented by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in reference to Section 67 of the NDPS Act may be a landmark declaration. an outsized number of individuals are imprisoned and punished within the last 35 years on the idea of statements made forcibly using interrogation , coercion and threats to violate their fundamental rights.
Speaking about the drugs angle within the case of Sushant Singh Rajput’s death, Maneshinde said, “In the case of all the accused within the SSR drugs angle case, there’s hardly any recovery and independent evidence to indict them for serious offenses. they’re detained on the idea of reckless statements. in sight of this decision presented by Justice Rohington Nariman and Naveen Sinha, an outsized number of accused will see the daylight. Manasinde concluded that the choice would “work in favor of eliminating those held in our half-ailed prisons,” concluding: “Riya Chakraborty’s case has lost total steam in virtue of the allegations supported this decision.”
Section 25 of the Evidence Act states that “Any confession given to a policeman shall not be proved against an individual accused of any crime.” a press release recorded under section 67 of the NDPS Act can’t be used as a confessional statement during a lawsuit. ” Offenses under the NDPS Act, “the apex court ruled.
The court stated that a fragile balance between the powers of the state and therefore the refore the fundamental rights of citizens is required and the NDPS Act should be considered against the backdrop of such rights and, therefore, many safeguards are thus enshrined within the NDPS Act, which may be a very stringent one. And of outstanding nature.
Analyzing various similar provisions, the apex court stated that section 67 of the NDPS Act is merely a clause which enables a politician to “collect the knowledge during which an inquiry is made”.
Sushant Singh Rajput’s sisters request Bombay HC for early hearing, fearing arrest by CBI
The NCB has arrested over 20 people for alleged drug nexus within the movie industry . In October, Riya was released on bail after almost a month in jail. Actors like Deepika Padukone, Sara Ali Khan, Shraddha Kapoor and Rakul Preet Singh were involved questioning.
Sushant died on 14 June, during which the Mumbai Police gave a verdict of suicide. His death is being investigated by the Central Bureau of Investigation.